The TVK defection case has reached the end of the road for now. According to a New Indian Express report, the Supreme Court has dismissed the petition against four former AIADMK legislators who quit their Assembly seats and later joined Thalapathy Vijay's party.
What the Supreme Court Decided
Per the report, the apex court threw out the case filed by a petitioner named Selvakumar, who had approached the court in June last year. His plea sought a bar on the four from contesting elections, arguing that resigning and then joining TVK amounted to a clear case of defection.
The dismissal, the report says, ends that petition. The article does not set out the court's detailed reasoning for this particular order, so we will not speculate on it. If the full order becomes available, we will update this piece.
The Four Leaders Named in the Case
The report names the four as follows:
- Maragatham Kumaravel, who won from Maduranthakam
- Sathyabama, who won from Dharapuram
- Isakki Subbaiah, who won from Ambasamudram
- Jayakumar, who won from Perundurai
All four had won the Tamil Nadu Assembly election on AIADMK tickets. According to the report, they resigned as MLAs after their victory and then joined TVK, which led to the petition.
A Second Ruling on October 26
The report also points to a related ruling on October 26. The Supreme Court is said to have rejected a writ petition by one M Srinivasan, who was challenging a Madras High Court order that had dismissed his plea. He wanted the CBI directed to register an FIR over alleged horse trading to prove a majority in the Tamil Nadu Assembly.
The names in that petition include N Anand alias Bussy N Anand, Maragatham Kumaravel, S Jayakumar, P Sathyabama and E Subaya alias Esakki Subaya. The report quotes the court as calling the sequence a "part of political process" and saying the plea was "without merits."
That matter, the report says, concerned six AIADMK legislators who voted against their party whip in a crucial Assembly vote, then resigned, and days later joined TVK, led by Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay. The report describes the court order in that matter as a big relief for those six MLAs. The petitioner argued it was a calculated way around the anti-defection law and that the Speaker should have pursued disqualification instead of accepting the resignations.
Note that the report refers to four MLAs in one case and six in the other. These appear to be separate petitions with overlapping names, but the article does not explain the link in detail.
Why Fans and Party Watchers Should Care
For supporters who have followed Vijay's journey from the cinema hall to public life, this is a legal milestone. Vijay's films have long dealt with questions of voting rights, accountability and public trust (Sarkar is the obvious example). Now his party is being tested in courtrooms as well as at the ballot box.
Both Supreme Court matters went the way of the legislators who moved to TVK. Defection disputes can drag on, and the report gives no indication of what comes next.
What We Do Not Know Yet
The report does not say whether the petitioner can seek any further remedy. It also does not give the full reasoning behind the first order. We have not independently verified the court documents, and everything above is attributed to the New Indian Express report. This story is reportorial only, and we will update it as more details emerge.
Spotted an error? Tell our desk. We correct mistakes openly.
